Ugraphia: The Pursuit of Perfect Legibility Vlad Atanasiu
Is perfect legibility, Ugraphia, possible outside of Thomas More’s Utopia? Understanding the limits of legibility is of practical relevance to typeface design and optometry, in addition to being of theoretical interest for research in human communication. Drawing on a wide range of material from paleography, typography, psychology, information theory, and cinema, and supplemented with an original experiment in script design, its argument reflected in idiosyncratically writing and layout styles, this cross-cultural history of legibility explores an interlocking complex of factors affecting progress in the long-term evolution of legibility.
Ugraphia reveals the divergence between industrial ideals, scientific theories, and popular representations of legibility, how power games are played and aesthetic fashions develop through scripts. Already loaded with heritage, scripts are being concomitantly constrained by character frequency variation between languages, visual perceptual effects, the kinematics of handwriting production, and the evolution of imaging, print and display technologies. There is limited progress found with respect to character structure, and a persistent flow and ebb in the legibility of handwriting (‘bioscript’); however, there is ample optimization of artificially produced writing (‘mechascript’), as well as a potential improvement in reading performance due to script proliferation and diversification.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36824/2025-atanasiu
Table of contents — 1901
Aims of book: investigate if perfect legibility is possible — 1908
Rhetoric: a scientific, literary, & graphic catalog of legibility constraints, illustrated with pictures, quotes, & typefaces, ranging from psychological to typographic to sociocultural to cinematic — 1909
Empirics. It is difficult to recognize the perfectly legible script when it is unclear how to measure legibility — 1915
Ideals. The present typographical ideal of legibility is invisibility: script should not distract from reading — 1917
Opinions on legibility — 1918
Theories. Legibility is impermanent: subjective & contextual, fluctuating with social & material conditions — 1938
Consequences. Does perfect legibility make us think differently? — 1943
Mythology. Genesis, treatment, & ultima ratio of illegibility — 1945
Legacy. Legibility is constrained by the legacy of character shapes — 1951
Overload. Legibility is constrained by non-visual factors: linguistic, economical, political, etc — 1952
Power. Legibility is the effectiveness of social control & command exerted by normative pattern production, while illegibility is a defense mechanism — 1959
Sausage. A diet of only one script, however perfect, will eventually make you sick — 1963
Set size. Plotting legibility against character set — 1965
Statistics. Differences in character frequency & combinatorics across languages, orthographies, & contents result in patterns of varying legibility — 1967
Gestalt. Contextual legibility optimization beyond local is difficult — 1968
Size. There is an optimal script size range for every user & application — 1971
Density. Legibility depends non-linearly on stroke density per character area — 1972
Gray. The textural pattern of paragraphscannot be influenced by script producers at content level — 1973
Contrast. Epigraphic shadows & color contrast between script & background affect legibility — 1975
Perception. Space perception is anisotropic, especially for dyslexics, one example among the many known & unknown perceptual phenomena affecting legibility — 1979
Phenomenology. Experience of a script’s persona impacts its legibility — 1980
Psychedelia. Getting high on legibility — 1983
Kinematics. Scripts are optimized for production facility, not solely visual appearance — 1984
Memory. Legibility is a matter of perfecting mnemonics — 1989
Synthesis. Mobiles, constraining factors, & attitudes are components of the legibility machinery — 2000
Evolution. Exposure to diverse scripts improves recognition performance — 2002
Acculturation. Syncretisms keep legibility in dynamic equilibrium — 2011
Personalization. Legibility is optimal when tuned to a specific reader — 2018
Plasticity. The tolerance range for deciphering bad writing is wide enough that most will care little about legibility until bad eyesight & old age catch up with us — 2019
Script Acts: Effective Imperfection. What counts in written communication are outcomes, not character recognition alone, which may even benefit from imperfection — 2021
Poiesis. Creative ambiguity — 2028
Undesirability. There are instances in which less legibility is desirable — 2030
Spectrum. There are application-specific degrees & kinds of legibility — 2034
Evidence. Legibility improves at a micromorphological level in artificially produced scripts, while the evolutionary improvement of character structure & handwriting is uncertain — 2034
Polygraphy. Presence of multiple scripts in the same document decreases legibility — 2048
Layout. Layout ergonomy depends on information selection & manipulation ease — 2053
Time. Legibility is degraded by script decay over time — 2061
Representation. Cinema represents legibility as a feat & a mystery to be pried open — 2063
Experiment. Script design is a compromise between many variables, only one being legibility — 2074
Next steps in legibility optimization — 2078
Exit. Concluding remarks — 2079
References — 2088
Ontoindex — 2110
Fonts — 2128
Acknowledgments — 2130
Mail — 2134
Vlad Atanasiu, Ugraphia: The Pursuit of Perfect Legibility, Grapholinguistics and Its Applications, vol. 6, Brest: Fluxus Editions, 2025
@BOOK{gla6-atanasiu,
AUTHOR = {Atanasiu, Vlad},
SERIES = {Grapholinguistics and Its Applications},
VOLUME = {6},
TITLE = {{(Ugraphia: The Pursuit of Perfect Legibility}},
PUBLISHER = {Fluxus Editions},
ADDRESS = {Brest},
YEAR = {2025},
DOI = {https://doi.org/10.36824/2025-atanasiu},
}